Nurse Group Pushes for Nurse Staffing Ratio in D.C. Hospitals

National Nurses United has joined a Washington, D.C. nurses’ union in calling for the renewal of a 2013 bill intended to mandate nurse ratios at the District’s hospitals.

NNU and the local union argue that understaffing in D.C. hospitals puts patients’ lives at risk, citing 215 separate occurrences when patients were “endangered” because of nurse staffing levels. One example describe a labor and delivery unit in which three nurses of a shift of ten were left to care for ten women in labor when five nurses were pulled away for two C-sections and a hemorrhaging patient.

The original bill would establish a minimum ratio of nurses to patients on every shift at every District hospital. Facilities in noncompliance would face a $25,000 daily fine; required overtime and averaged ratios would be banned.

While some Council members support the legislation, which mirrors legislation enacted in California ten years ago, hospitals argue that the bill fails to consider the unpredictability of staffing needs and unnecessarily raises their cost of labor.

Increased labor costs can slow down hospitals’ payments to their vendors. If slow hospital payments threaten your healthcare company’s cash flow, PRN Funding’s healthcare factoring programs can help. Contact us today to learn how healthcare factoring for your specialty can help you thrive.

Medicaid Expansion Reduces Uninsured Hospital Visits

States that chose to expand their Medicaid services under the Affordable Care Act are seeing significant reductions in uninsured hospital visits.

A review of publicly traded hospitals’ earnings calls by The Washington Post shows that uninsured (self-pay) hospital visits dropped between 28 and 33 percent at some of the largest hospital systems in the country in states that took advantage of the federally-funded Medicaid expansion. At the same time, Medicaid admissions increased anywhere from 4 to 22 percent at those same facilities.

The story is less encouraging in the 24 states that refused Medicaid expansion. Non-expansion states saw upticks in both self-pay ER visits and uninsured admissions, and some actually had decreased Medicaid admissions. Hospitals have pushed for Medicaid expansion, arguing that even Medicaid’s lower reimbursement rates are better than what they (often do not) collect from uninsured patients.

Many states have also dragged their feet in preparing for the ACA’s broader implementation of presumptive eligibility, a system by which hospitals can preemptively enroll families with qualifying income in a Medicaid program to provide them care up-front. The state Medicaid agency then processes the complete application, putting many otherwise uninsured families on the path to coverage.

There are troubling financing implications for the uneven expansion of Medicaid around the country. The increase of self-pay patients in non-expansion states increases the amount of potentially uncollectible funds owed to those hospital systems and facilities, which also raises the risk to a healthcare factoring company.

Factors collect from insurance, Medicaid, and Medicare, but not from individual patients; therefore, more self-pay accounts reduce the number of valid invoices that a hospital can factor to offset the gap in federal reimbursements. If the above numbers continue their current trajectories, there is a very real possibility that healthcare factoring companies may tighten their requirements for working with clients in non-expansion states – or decline to work with them altogether.

We will continue to provide updates on Medicaid expansion and its impact on facilities in both expanded and non-expanded states.

PRN Funding offers healthcare factoring services to vendors providing a variety of healthcare services to hospitals and other healthcare facilities. Learn more about the different healthcare factoring options we provide and fill out our easy online application to begin.

ACA: Enrollment Passes 8 Million, Uninsured Rate Lowest Since 2008

The Obama administration announced last month that enrollments in the ACA exchanges topped eight million.

As of April 19, 8.019 million people had signed up for Obamacare plans – an impressive national average despite a large disparity between individual state enrollments. Some states missed their enrollment targets by a wide margin, while others more than doubled their goal.

In addition to marketplace policies, 4.8 million consumers enrolled in Medicaid plans in their states between October 1 and April 19, and nearly five million consumers purchased policies outside the exchanges. Altogether, the administration estimates that up to 18 million consumers have purchased new healthcare policies during the six-month enrollment period measured.

While some consumers may have been previously insured, a majority of marketplace users who requested subsidies self-reported that they did not have insurance when they applied. Further evidence is in the numbers: a Gallup poll reports that the uninsured rate by the end of the first quarter is down to 13.4 percent, the lowest level since the recession began in 2008 and down from 17.3 percent in January.

Health care executives presented preliminary payment information to the House Energy and Commerce oversight subcommittee last week that shows between 80 and 90 percent of new premiums are paid, well above the 67 percent reported by members of the same committee the week prior.

PRN Funding offers healthcare factoring solutions to help providers control costs – including health care. Learn more about our healthcare factoring services and apply for a free factoring quote today!

Enhanced by Zemanta

Medicare Payments Concentrated in Few Specialties

Medicare’s 2012 payments to providers were largely concentrated in a few specialties, according to recent disclosures.

An analysis of federal physician billing data illustrates that 14 percent of disbursements went to the top one percent of physicians, with the bulk of payments concentrated in oncology and ophthalmology.

Without information about individual patient cases, though, physicians argue that the raw data lacks the necessary context to be applied effectively. Billing data was off-limits from 1979 until 2013 due to an injunction filed by the AMA for this reason, among others. Many physicians are also concerned that patient and physician privacy could be at risk now that billing data is available.

That oncology and ophthalmology top the list of highest-paid specialties is unsurprising given that Medicare patients aged 65 and older are their primary demographic. Much of the money paid out to ophthalmologists covered many common eye drugs that the physicians purchase up front and prescribe for little profit. On the other hand, last year CMS reduced payments for cataract surgery to reflect updates to the procedure.

Economists hope to use billing data to identify physicians who perform high-revenue procedures with little value to the patient in order to increase their billing. The greatest concern posed by the information as presented is the possibility that some seniors may go through unnecessary treatment simply for a higher paycheck. The AMA cautions that the data released do not illustrate the value of services provided, however.

PRN Funding is a leading provider of invoice factoring services to healthcare providers. To learn more about healthcare factoring, visit our Web site and fill out an easy online application.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Are Temporary Nurses More Cost-Effective Than Overtime?

A Columbia University study suggests that hospitals can cut their costs and improve the quality of patient care by paying overtime instead of hiring temporary nurses, but other recent studies tell a different story.

The study, which focused on 900,000 admissions in the Veterans Administration health system over the last four years, correlated shorter patient stays with lower costs and better treatment. Researchers also suggested that paying overtime to a core staff of nurses resulted in more positive results than bringing in temporary nurses because of the “rhythm and routines” they establish.

Columbia’s conclusions counter those of a 2012 Penn State study, as well as a different Columbia study published last year. The results of both studies indicated that poor hospital environments are the greater contributor to adverse patient outcomes, regardless of the employment status of the nurses. The Penn study went even further and cited the hiring of temporary nurse staff as a potentially life-saving move – and, at least, that their use “does not appear to have deleterious consequences for patient mortality”.

A co-leader of the earlier Columbia study pointed out in a press release that temporary nurses are often scapegoated for lower patient outcomes that result from poor work environments that turn away qualified permanent staff. Dr. JingJing Shang also touted the benefits of a traveling nurse arrangement that creates ongoing assignments for nurses in the same facility.

Other potential issues with Columbia’s cost-benefit analysis include the potential for nurses working overtime to make costly and life-threatening errors because of burnout, a result that may be mitigated by using temporary nurse staffing.

PRN Funding has offered exceptional cash flow solutions to temporary nurse staffing agencies for more than a decade. To learn more about healthcare factoring for temporary nurse staffing and receive an application, contact us today!

ICD-10 Delay: What Should We Do?

The news of ICD-10’s delay until at least October 2015 has prompted a range of responses from vendors and providers, mostly predicated on whether or not they were prepared for a transition to occur later this year. With a delay signed into law and a new deadline yet to be announced, many organizations are lamenting the dollars and hours they have spent to be ready and the money they will now have to invest in waiting out the delay.

There are two paths of action that providers and vendors can take in the minimum 18-month waiting period now facing them: stay ahead of the game, or catch up.

If you’re ready, stay on the ball.

ICD-10’s delay unfortunately has the collateral effect of punishing companies that worked to put new systems in place well ahead of the latest deadline. Many of these companies have invested money into software, employee training, and testing procedures and are reluctant to invest even more to maintain an indefinite ready state.

For these companies, professionals advise to keep forging ahead. Unless there is an announcement down the line that ICD-10 will be skipped entirely, prepared vendors and providers can stay ahead of the curve by continuing to test their updates and train coders to comply with ICD-10. In addition, you can cease dual coding once your ICD-10 accuracy reaches acceptable levels and simply translate ICD-10 codes to the less specific ICD-9 codes for billing until the new standard is officially implemented.

If you’re not ready, get there.

The minimum eighteen-month delay is a significant reprieve for providers, vendors, and payers that are not on track for a timely transition, including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. For these companies, it is critical to make the best use of the extension they have been given.

Companies that have found ICD-10 preparation to be a heavy financial burden should make and implement a plan to invest in the necessary training and software with enough time to undergo full testing. If companies choose to drag their feet further and squander the added time, it could result in hundreds of thousands of wasted dollars and more delays down the road. The Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) is pushing for CMS to take the lead on end-to-end testing, though CMS has no plans to conduct their own testing until at least July of this year.

If the ICD-10 delay is causing cash flow problems for your company, PRN Funding can help. Our healthcare factoring programs give you immediate access to cash that you can invest in infrastructure, training, and further developing advances such as the ICD-10 transition. Contact us to find out more about healthcare factoring services and to receive an application today.

Enhanced by Zemanta

New Bill Delays ICD-10 Again, Indefinitely

Despite claims by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services that the October 1, 2014 deadline for the final transition to ICD-10 was firm, President Obama has signed a new law that will push ICD-10 back until at least October 2015.

H.R. 4302, “Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014”, is primarily the latest in a series of patches to Medicare’s sustainable growth rate; however, Section 212 of the bill prohibits the Secretary of Health and Human Services from replacing the current coding standard, ICD-9, with the new ICD-10 any time before October 1, 2015.

The delay has caused significant frustration and may compound difficulties for providers racing to be ICD-10 compliant. Providers at various stages of preparation for ICD-10 will have to maintain both their ICD-10 systems and their current ICD-9 systems until the switch takes place; in addition, many providers who are prepared to begin training for ICD-10 will have to postpone their efforts until a new deadline is announced.

Because the ICD-10 mandate is unfunded, the cost of preparation has fallen to providers who may suffer financially due to a delay. There is also little indication that payers are prepared for billing changes that will take place with ICD-10. At the same time, however, providers who are not as close to full ICD-10 implementation will have at least an additional year to upgrade technology, train their employees, and update their procedures. For payers, the delay will provide additional opportunities for critical end-to-end systems tests.

Proponents of ICD-10 argue that the new system will allow for more accurate coding of a variety of medical conditions, which will not only improve the quality of care but will also streamline billing processes by reducing requests for additional documentation. Health information management professionals recommend that providers stay on track for complete ICD-10 preparation, including a complete shift to ICD-10 coding with translations to ICD-9 until the standard is changed.

ICD-10 may also have a significant impact on healthcare vendors. Medical billing and coding agencies stand to benefit from providers choosing to outsource coding in advance of changing standards, yet all vendors may face longer waits for payment from facilities struggling to meet increasing financial demands.

We will continue to monitor updates to the ICD-10 transition and report on them as they come.

PRN Funding offers alternative financing solutions for healthcare vendors that need to tighten their cash flow in the wake of extended payments. Learn more about our various healthcare factoring programs, then contact us to receive an application and to get started immediately.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Study Finds Healthcare Sector among Most Obese

In a seemingly ironic twist of circumstance, the American Journal of Preventive Medicine reported that the healthcare industry is among the top 10 most obese industries.

The data analyzed came from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey as well as self-reported personal statistics from employees. All healthcare workers are included in the overall “healthcare” sector, but a breakdown of health service employees versus practitioners indicates that the former are more at risk for obesity than the latter.

Researchers correlate risk for obesity in the job sectors listed to job factors such as stress, long hours, and working conditions that minimize movement and activity. In that respect, healthcare practitioners such as doctors and nurses benefit from time spent on their feet going between patients.

Long hours and shift work can make it difficult for workers to fit exercise into their schedule or to prepare and eat healthy, balanced meals – after all, a trip through the drive-thru is faster and less labor-intensive, thus more appealing to an employee coming off of (or heading into) a 12-hour shift. Also at issue are differences in pay that can prevent some workers from choosing healthier options.

One possible contributor to obesity in the healthcare setting that is not discussed, but that has interesting implications, is a shift toward banning smoking by healthcare employees. Healthcare employees who quit smoking may compensate by eating more, either to fill the time or because of the lack of cigarettes’ appetite suppressant effect.

Obesity can be a significant contributor to health care costs. With that in mind, understanding the prevalence of obesity in the healthcare industry – as well as its causes – can help healthcare employers adapt their working conditions and employee benefits to promote healthier lifestyles. For example, a hospital may offer free or subsidized memberships to gyms or weight-loss programs, or tie the achievement of health goals to lower premiums.

PRN Funding offers invoice factoring to the healthcare industry, which can improve your cash flow and allow you to invest in your employees’ health. Contact PRN Funding to learn more about your healthcare factoring options and to fill out an application today!

ACA: Race to Enrollment Deadline is Frustrating but Successful

By now, Monday’s deadline to enroll in a valid health insurance plan is old news – as is the eleventh-hour rule change allowing consumers to apply for short-term extensions as long as they have attempted to enroll before March 31.

Many more consumers will fall into that latter category thanks to a last-minute race by thousands to meet the enrollment deadline, a process highlighted by more difficulty accessing state and federal marketplace Web sites.

The online marketplaces went through intermittent overload periods until mid-afternoon on March 31. Consumers at home and enrollment counselors processing in-person applications were shut out of the Web site for long periods, likely due to a software glitch discovered during an overnight maintenance session. Enrollment counselors could do little more than create an account for each consumer so they would be eligible for the enrollment extension.

State-run exchanges faced similar difficulties, as well as similar influxes of consumers looking to beat the deadline. At all levels, consumers that have accessed the marketplace but have not successfully enrolled in a healthcare plan will have a blanket extension until mid-April to complete their enrollment without paying the tax penalty.

Despite the minor Web site setbacks and the decision of many Americans to not enroll in marketplace health plans at all, figures released April 1 indicate that completed enrollments exceeded the Congressional Budget Office’s projected target of seven million to the tune of at least 100,000 additional enrollments. That number does not include Medicaid enrollments in states with expanded eligibility, nor does it include consumers who began the enrollment process but did not yet complete it.

PRN Funding can help you provide health coverage to your employees by turning your open invoices into immediate cash. Contact PRN Funding today and learn how healthcare factoring can benefit your company.

ACA: The Cost of Non-Enrollment

With the March 31 enrollment deadline looming, the Obama administration is working overtime to encourage uninsured Americans to purchase coverage in state or federal marketplaces. Approximately 50 percent of uninsured consumers plan to remain uninsured for a number of reasons, raising the important question: what is the cost of not enrolling in a valid healthcare plan?

Required Coverage

ACA-compliant health insurance policies must meet the law’s requirements for minimum essential coverage, which includes all government-administered plans as well as new and grandfathered employer plans and coverage offered by universities. While other plans may also meet the minimum essential coverage standard, consumers who hold non-compliant policies will be subject to the same penalty as uninsured consumers. Vision and dental-only plans, workers’ compensation, and healthcare savings accounts do not qualify as compliant policies.

Most consumers are required to carry a compliant healthcare plan; however, the ACA provides a number of exemptions for consumers who are unable to afford a qualifying plan or who fit other criteria.

How does the penalty work?

The 2014 penalty for uninsured consumers is the greater of $95 per adult/$47.50 per child, up to $285 per family, or one percent of your family’s gross adjusted income above the tax return filing threshold. (If your income is not high enough to require a tax filing, you are exempt from the individual mandate.)

Despite the focus on the $95 flat fee, more consumers earn more than the $19,650 that matches the $95 fee and will be required to pay a higher amount. For example, a family earning $50,000 annually would have to pay $297, or one percent of their eligible AGI – $12 more than the flat fee maximum. Though penalties are capped at approximately $9,800, many families do not make enough to meet this cap and will be on the hook for their entire penalty.

Can I enroll after the March 31 deadline?

Your ability to enroll in the federal marketplace after the deadline depends on a number of conditions. Currently, consumers who have attempted to purchase a healthcare plan prior to March 31 will be granted a limited extension to complete their enrollment. Once extensions have ended, you must wait until the next open enrollment period unless you have a change in life situation that qualifies you to enroll.

If you signed up for a policy before March 31 that features a gap in coverage (i.e. does not start immediately), you will not have to pay the penalty. Also, if you are without insurance for less than three months after the deadline you will not have to pay the penalty. For periods longer than three months but less than a year, you will be responsible for each month’s portion of the annual penalty for as long as you are uninsured.

For questions about your specific healthcare needs and plans that are available, visit Healthcare.gov.

Older Posts
Newer Posts